The Nikon D200 was released in 2005, back when digital photography was still in it’s nascent stages and film was still reigning. The professional grade D1, D1X and D1H have already been released on the Nikon roster alongside the Nikon F5 (film pro grade body).

According to DPRreview, the D100 started a new camera segment in the under $2000 USD range, and was potentially a game changer as it made enthusiast grade DSLRs even more approachable for professionals and enthusiasts alike. The D200 looks to continue that trend.

Now, in 2021, about 15 years after it’s entry into the market, I would like to revisit it to see how the camera has aged over the years. I’m certainly not going to change my primary camera (Nikon Z6) to the D200, but it would be an interesting look at how far camera tech advances have progress since the early 2000s.


In hand, the grip immediately feels familiar to anyone who has used a Nikon DSLR in the last 10 years. Instead of the straight, film camera like grip from the D100, we now have the curved grip. Looking at the camera as a whole, it definitely looks as though the D200 has set the tone for the rest of the it’s descendants to come.

The camera is weighty, but I would describe it as a reassuring heft rather than simply heavy. The entire chassis inspires confidence, though people who have since moved on to mirrorless, like me, will feel the additional weight after a few hours.

Top left dial

A very familiar dial with all Nikon shooters

The now familiar top left dial used commonly in pro grade Nikon DSLRs is used in the D200, as compared to the older dial format used in the D100. Having shot widely with Nikon Pro grade bodies from D3 onwards, my muscle memory did not fail me and I was able to use the D200 quite smoothly to change my settings.

Back LCD

A bigger LCD panel compared to the D100, but still lacking by modern standards

The bigger rear LCD panel is a welcome change compared to the tiny one on the D100. I could comfortably check my shots on the panel. Color accuracy and portrayal was also no longer an issue. The only complaint I had was that the panel itself wasn’t very high resolution. This upgrade came eventually in the D300.


The top LCD panel is quite large

The top LCD panels show the shooting information such as ISO, shutter speed and aperture settings, as well as the number of shots remaining if you need it. The large panel is welcome since all the information is laid out clearly and easy to see.


The familiar custom menus have appeared here, and most modern Nikon users will be right at home using these menus, a massive upgrade from the archaic menus in the D100. There are quite a few custom functions to be used here as well, controlling the AF system, the playback and shooting as well.


You may have noticed already, but the 2 button card formatting short cut has already been implemented in the D200 (one of the buttons is the mode button as shown in the picture above, with the red text beside it). This is definitely one of the functions in Nikon DSLRs that I personally found useful, since it allows me to quickly format and prepare my storage cards before a shoot instead of going through a series of menus to do so. The current batch of mirrorless cameras do not have this shortcut (i mapped it to function buttons myself.)

Note the AF control and the card release lever

The back of the camera has 2 important dials, one controlling the release of the CF card slot and the other one controlling the AF system, whether it be single AF point or the very intuitive group AF point detection, which I found in practice to be rather accurate for tracking large subjects.

Card slot

1 card slot, but the slot is weather sealed

The card slot remains a single CF card slot, but the position has now been shifted to the now familiar right side of the camera, with the release button there as well. The slot is opened from the lever at the back, visible in the top left of the picture.

There is built in weather sealing, with rubber gaskets around the card slot to prevent or slow entry of water.

Sensor/ Image quality

Color edits added, but the original image wasn’t bad to begin with

As I mentioned in the D100, sensor tech has advanced rapidly over the years. A sensor from 15 years ago, even one that is of APS-C size, can barely keep up even with smartphone cameras, especially those from high end phones such as iPhone Maxes and the Samsung S20s with optimised software and hardware.

With a decent prime lens like the Nikon AF-S 50mm 1.4G, however, one can still get some pretty good pictures that are sufficient for small prints and smartphone screens.


The D200 sensor offers only about 10.2MP, nothing much to shout about now, but back in 2005 this was pretty much state of the art. At this MP count, one can expect to print images of 13 by 9 inches (1inch = 2.54 cm) at 300ppi. This means we could print A4 sizes comfortably.

Image quality comparisons

During shooting, I noticed that the ISO options in the D200 are leaning more towards the exposing brighter situations compared to the D100, given that the base ISO has been reduced to 100 instead of 200 and the maximum ISO (Hi-1) is now only 3200 instead of the D6400 in the D100.

Both images shot at 50mm, f5.6. Left image is at ISO100, right image is at Hi1 (3200)

At base ISO up to ISO 400, I would have no issues with image quality. After 800, though, the grain starts becoming more prominent. At Hi1 (3200), the image is extremely grainy and there is reddish/ purple color noise in the dark areas. As you can see from the comparison above, there is a reddish tinge to the image shot at ISO 3200.

Dynamic Range

Image shot at ISO125, adjusted in Lightroom

The image above was adjusted in Lightroom and had shadows boosted and highlights recovered. Apologies for the lacklustre sunset image but I was more interested in testing the sensor of the camera. Shooting in raw at base ISOs yield very decent image quality with good dynamic range. Definitely useable even by 2021 standards.


Nikon Multi-CAM 1000

The D200 uses the 11 point Multi cam 1000 which was later used for more than a decade even until the D3500. Whether Nikon made improvements on the module over the years remains to be seen, the AF system worked reasonable well during the tests, albeit on relatively non challenging subjects such as slow moving animals.

Single point speed

Using the camera in single point was fast and snappy, but of course, the AF speed also depends largely on the lens being used. Third party lenses with weaker AF motors will naturally be slower, while the pro grade 2.8 zooms will be blazing fast.


Custom menus have been added, here it shows group dynamic AF control

When the camera is set to continuous focus mode, using the AF mode dial at the back set at group AF, I was able to achieve reasonably fast tracking speeds using the Nikon 24-70 2.8 zoom.


Similar to the D100, this generation of Nikon 3 digit series has yet to implement a video taking mode. Naturally, you can take “videos” by building a time lapse from the photos shot on the D200, if you consider that videotaking 😉

Concluding thoughts

Image quality is objectively decent but lacking somewhat in 2021

The jump from D100 to D200 was staggering. The D200 felt familiar in so many ways, from the custom menu layouts to the dials and button placements. The top left dial last all the way even til the D850, one of the most advanced DSLRs ever made (at least as of 2021). The button placements at the back and the AF switch remained at the locations introduced in the D200. The AF module was used all the way until the present, in the entry level bodies.

Ergonomics and useability wise, there were very few complaints from me in the D200.

Image quality remains an issue, however. The age of the sensor is showing, and the lack of megapixels is an issue in the age of 4k displays in TVs, monitors and smartphones. At base ISO, shooting raw files, one is still able to recover some highlights and shadows. Above ISO 1600, however image quality starts to fall apart.

Would I recommend anyone buy a used D200? Even if you’re yearning for nostalgia, to be honest, there’s better value to be had in getting a used D300 over this. The older sensor, relatively weak AF system and the pricing of the D300 (in Singapore, you can get a beater set for under SG$100) means that the D200 has well and truely been rendered obsolete.

Collectors, of course, would buy it just for the sake of getting one. Others, your money is better spent elsewhere.

If you found this article useful, please consider buying me a coffee here. Thanks for your support! 😀